首页 > 按专业查询名词 > 查询PubMed相关文献
名词信息
Pubmed相关的文献
biological tricuspid valve replacement相关文献:
Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Mechanical or Biological Prostheses? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cheng Z, Fang T, Wang D, Guo Y.
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Mar 3;24(2):E209-E214. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3531.
PMID:33798052
Should a Mechanical or Biological Prosthesis Be Used for a Tricuspid Valve Replacement? A Meta-Analysis.
Liu P, Qiao WH, Sun FQ, Ruan XL, Al Shirbini M, Hu D, Chen S, Dong NG.
J Card Surg. 2016 May;31(5):294-302. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12730. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
PMID:26956806
Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage.
Généreux P, Pibarot P, Redfors B, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Jaber WA, Svensson LG, Kapadia S, Tuzcu EM, Thourani VH, Babaliaros V, Herrmann HC, Szeto WY, Cohen DJ, Lindman BR, McAndrew T, Alu MC, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Kodali SK, Smith CR, Miller DC, Webb JG, Leon MB.
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3351-3358. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx381.
PMID:29020232
FBN1-Related Marfan Syndrome.
Dietz H.
2001 Apr 18 [updated 2022 Feb 17]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2024.
PMID:20301510
Bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement: Biological age is not the same as chronological age.
Van den Eynde J, Schuermans A.
JTCVS Open. 2023 Mar 25;15:173-174. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.03.008. eCollection 2023 Sep.
PMID:37808029
Assessment of long-term outcomes: aortic valve reimplantation versus aortic valve and root replacement with biological valved conduit in aortic root aneurysm with tricuspid valve.
Yamabe T, Zhao Y, Kurlansky PA, Nitta S, Borger MA, George I, Smith CR, Takayama H.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 13;59(3):658-665. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa389.
PMID:33230518
Tricuspid Valve Replacement, Mechnical vs. Biological Valve, Which Is Better?
Altaani HA, Jaber S.
Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2013 Jun;7(2):71-4. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
PMID:24757625
Percutaneous tricuspid valve implantation in failing bioprosthesis.
Eicken A, Ewert P.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Dec;8(6):765-770. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.09.08.
PMID:30740323
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Negm S, Arafat AA, Elatafy EE, Fawzy HF.
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Mar;30(3):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
PMID:33229238
Tricuspid valve replacement: results of an orphan procedure - which is the best prosthesis?
Wiedemann D, Rupprechter V, Mascherbauer J, Kammerlander A, Mora B, Dimitrov K, Weber B, Andreas M, Laufer G, Kocher A.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Aug;59(4):626-632. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10392-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
PMID:29430890
© Copyright 2021 鸿泰茂源  版权所有All Rights Reserved京ICP备11040441号-3