Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Housmans S, van Kuijk S, Deprest J, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven H.
BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1284-1293. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16242. Epub 2020 May 10.
PMID:32267624
Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial).
Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, Alhafidh AH, Hakvoort RA, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW.
BMC Womens Health. 2011 Feb 15;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-4.
PMID:21324143
Low expression of collagen type-1 in sacrouterine ligament as risk factor of stage III-IV uterine prolapse.
Mega Putra IG, Ngurah Warsita IG, Suwiyoga K, Fajar Manuaba IBG, Budiana ING, Putra Wiradnyana AAG.
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
van IJsselmuiden MN, Coolen AL, Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Bongers M, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Deprest J, van Eijndhoven HW.