Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.
Kiger ME, Varpio L.
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
Sampling Methods.
Berndt AE.
J Hum Lact. 2020 May;36(2):224-226. doi: 10.1177/0890334420906850. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Sample size calculations.
Noordzij M, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ.
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(4):c319-23. doi: 10.1159/000322830. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Meta-Analysis of Proportions.
Schwarzer G, Rücker G.
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:159-172. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_10.
Pair-switching rerandomization.
Zhu K, Liu H.
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2127-2142. doi: 10.1111/biom.13712. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.
Guest G, Namey E, Chen M.
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes.
Efird J.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15-20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.
Wing C, Simon K, Bello-Gomez RA.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Method Development in Forensic Toxicology.
Peters FT, Wissenbach DK, Busardo FP, Marchei E, Pichini S.
Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(36):5455-5467. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170622113331.
Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome.
Burgess S.
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):922-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
