Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
Uterosacral and sacrospinous ligament suspension for restoration of apical vaginal support.
Morgan DM, Larson K.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;53(1):72-85. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181cf2d51.
Single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension via the natural vaginal cavity (SvNOTES) for pelvic prolapse: The first feasibility study.
Lyu Y, Ding H, Ding J, Luo Y, Guan X, Ni G.
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 18;9:911553. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.911553. eCollection 2022.
Complications After Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation at Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Stairs J, Jain M, Chen I, Clancy A.
Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Dec 1;28(12):834-841. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001234. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
Surgical management of vaginal prolapse: current surgical concepts.
Murphy AM, Clark CB, Denisenko AA, D'Amico MJ, Vasavada SP.
Can J Urol. 2021 Aug;28(S2):22-26.
Sacrospinous Ligament Vaginal Vault Suspension - Anterior Approach.
Mangel J.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6S):S155-S156. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.587. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):63.e1-63.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.048. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Van Eijndhoven HW.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):252.e1-252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse.
Zhu H, Sun Y, Zheng X.
Am J Transl Res. 2021 May 15;13(5):5672-5678. eCollection 2021.
