Test-retest variability of cyclodeviations measured using the double Maddox rod test.
Liebermann L, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM.
J AAPOS. 2018 Apr;22(2):146-148.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.09.010. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
Effect of the prism and Maddox rod test as the surgical target for type III acute acquired comitant esotropia.
Wang H, Zheng W.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 15;11:1389201. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1389201. eCollection 2024.
The Maddox rod test: a ten-year follow-up.
SNYDACKER D.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1962;60:293-303.
Size of line in the Maddox-rod test.
SCOBEE RG, GREEN EL.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1948 Jun;31(6):697-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(48)91914-x.
The Maddox Rod Screen Test.
Dolman P.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1919;17:235-49.
Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation.
Liebermann L, Hatt SR, Leske DA, Klaehn LD, Kramer AM, Holmes JM.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:332-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
Maddox rod as a test of retinal function.
PRIMROSE J.
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1956;76:323-7.
Color dissociation artifacts in double Maddox rod cyclodeviation testing.
Simons K, Arnoldi K, Brown MH.
Ophthalmology. 1994 Dec;101(12):1897-901. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31086-4.
Accuracy of double Maddox rod with induced hypertropia in normal subjects.
Marsh JD, Durkin MW, Hack AE, Markowitz BB, Cheeseman EW.
Am Orthopt J. 2014;64:76-80. doi: 10.3368/aoj.64.1.76.
The Maddox rod test: a ten-year follow-up.
SNYDACKER D.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1963 Mar;55:484-8.
