Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review.
Lassmann Ł, Nowak Z, Żółtowska A.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.017. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Aljohani AO, Sghaireen MG, Abbas M, Alzarea BK, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Issrani R, Mathew M, Alsharari AHL, Alsharari MAD, Aljunaydi NA, Alanazi S, Alsharari MMS, Alam MK.
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;13(6):1352. doi: 10.3390/life13061352.
A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Relationship between Incisal and Condylar Guidance.
Oancea L, Munteanu I, Macris A, Radulescu S, Ciocan T.
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Jun;18(2):257-265. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.2.257.
Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
Kumar CD, Selvaraj S, Mohan J, Raju R.
Ann Afr Med. 2023 Jul-Sep;22(3):316-320. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_70_22.
Comparison of Techniques for Obtaining Centric Relation Based on the Reproducibility of the Condylar Positions in Centric Relation-A Systematic Review.
de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Dos Santos DM, de Magalhães Bertoz AP, Moreno ALM, Goiato MC.
Eur J Dent. 2022 May;16(2):251-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735903. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Occlusal consequence of using average condylar guidance settings: An in vitro study.
Lee W, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB.
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Apr;117(4):532-538. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
Comparative Evaluation of the Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Protrusive Interocclusal Records, OPG, and CBCT in Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study.
Gheedle R, John P.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Jun 1;24(6):403-408. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3517.
A study to evaluate the influence of condylar and incisal guidance in canine guided and group function occlusal schemes.
Sippy VR, Hegde C, Shetty G.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul-Sep;21(3):256-261. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_183_21.
Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study.
Singh K, Singh A, Jayam C, Singh R, Huda I, Nabi AT.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):47-50.
Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
Das A, Muddugangadhar BC, Mawani DP, Mukhopadhyay A.
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):753-757. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.033. Epub 2020 May 15.
